Allah Ke Banday Movie Review
Allah Ke Banday
Starring: Naseeruddin Shah, Sharman Joshi, Faruk Kabir
Written & Directed by Faruk Kabir
Rating: ***
A feeling of foreboding and damnation builds up in the narration from the first frame itself. Here’s a gloriously gutsy film exploring the underbelly of Mumbai through the lives of two slumkids who grow up in identical circumstances but with somewhat disparate values.
First-time director Faruk Kabir displays remarkable skill in creating a pastiche of mammoth crime and little punishment. The pace leaves meager space for grace. And yet Allah Ke Bande creates a world filled with acute aggression repression and damnation with a reasonable amount of paciness to the edgy narrative.
The world that Faruk Kabir’s characters inhabit is reminiscent of Danny Boyle’s Slumdog Millionaire, Irrfan Kamal’s underrated Thanks, Maa, Mahesh Manjrekar’s City Of Gold and Chandan Arora’s Striker. Deriving its lingering study of juvenile delinquency from these sources Allah Ke Banday moves forward and acquires a life of its own.
The gripping narrative takes us through the world of petty crime and underage lawlessness non-judgementally. Faruk Kabir’s deeply-felt concern for children who dodder dangerously on the edge of society is never over-done. This is a hard and disturbing look-see at quicksand existence. The director creates a world of uncertainties with unwavering confidence.
The nervous anxiety of the characters is rather aptly replicated in the film’s rough and unvarnished look. Kabir’s cameraman Vishal Sinha goes through the rugged merciless slums searching for only Allah-knows what.
The actors wear their unwashed demeanour casually, so much so that at times we forget the existence of the camera. At the same time there are uneven sections in the narrative that mar what could otherwise have been a stand-out exposition on the genesis of social outcasts.
Sharman Joshi and Faruk Kabir play the two driving forces of the plot with a deep understanding of their characters and the milieu. Both seem to have got right their characters’ physicality and then proceeded to explore their inner worlds. For a first-time actor and director Faruk Kabir handles both his jobs with more than a reasonable amount of compelling confidence.
The others in the cast merge into the relentless mileu. As usual the extraordinarily brilliant Naseeruddin Shah is under-used. Whenever he shows up on screen an extra dimension is effortlessly added to the proceedings.
Notches above the run-of-the-mill entertainer Allah Ke Banday reveals a genuine concern for juvenile delinquency. The lives on the streets never looked more dangerous and less glamorous. This time crime is not glorified. Thank God for small mercies.
Break Ke Baad Movie Reviews
By Vinay sharma
Cast: Imran Khan, Deepika Padukone, Sharmila Tagore, Lillete Dubea, Shahana Goswami, Navin Nischol, Yudhistir Urs
Director: Danish Aslam
Rating: ** 1/2
Bollywood has a sub-genre of romantic-comedies meant for urban, chic teenagers, first pioneered with its full frontal glory by our very own coffee drinking Karan Johar.
These films, and the people that inhabit it, are nothing like you have ever known, or are ever likely to know. But the reality inside it is so glossy and Cinderellaesque that everyone aspires for this free floating, un-rooted, but super fun unreality.
"Break Ke Baad" is a fun example of that.
Aaliya (Deepika Padukone) and Abhay (Imran Khan) are childhood sweethearts whose sweet course of sugarcane love encounters the roadblock of youthful ambition. Aaliya, a fiercely independent, risk-taking person decides to go to Australia to pursue her acting ambition, thus breaking the relationship. Both make mistakes, but eventually discover themselves only to realize that it's not that easy to say 'talaq' to a love, that has now matured.
"Break Ke Baad" is the ultimate, teenage, escape, love fantasy of 2010, much like "Jaane Tu…" in 2008 and "Love Aaj Kal" in 2009, in whose magical world, almost everything happens coincidentally and all loose ends are tied up perfectly in the end and all that you see makes sense. But we know that such a mythical, unreality can exist only in Bollywood.
Yet, the film is good in its own sub-genre. The strongest part of the film is a well-baked script; tight, crisp and thankfully contemporary and often rooted dialogues of Renuka Kunzru, which are funny at times, and profound in a cliched way at others.
Yet the film will never make it to the annals of Bollywood greats. Neither does it have the cuteness of Aamir Khan's launch vehicle "Qayamat Se Qayamat Tak", or the undertone of class struggle depicted with extreme melodrama in "Maine Pyaar Kiya", the overtone of struggle against tradition of "Dilwale Dulhania Le Jayenge" or the excessive sugar-pulp and totally nonexistent reality of "Kuch Kuch Hota Hai" (KKHH) - a film which this one pays hearty tributes to.
The conflict is mostly in the minds of the protagonist, and not real. Ironically its fault would perhaps be that it is not unreal enough like KKHH.
Though the characterizations, at least in the beginning and in a few side characters, has the smell (or stench if you consider the escapist drama) of reality, it flies off to KKHH land. At least the old films were caricatures, exaggerations of people you would have encountered somewhere. No such luck with "Break Ke Baad".
But it is fodder for teen fantasy, seeped in the dual confusion of maturing while finding true love. It's over two hour ride is fun, full time-pass and paisa vasool.
Golmaal 3 Movie Review
By Satyen K. Bordoloi
Cast: Kareena Kapoor, Ajay Devgn, Mithun Chakraborty, Kunal Khemu, Tusshar Kapoor, Arshad Warsi, Johny Lever, Ratna Pathak-Shah
Director: Rohit Shetty
Rating: ***
It is touted as the first trilogy of Indian cinema. It's about time that the distant cousin of Hollywood had one. Yet, what's important is that Bollywood did not need to have trilogies as one hit film has the habit of spawning a whole generation of films that look and feel like the original. "Golmaal 3" also suffers from that syndrome. Thankfully, it only feels like its previous avatars.
Despite retaining most characters from its previous outings, "Golmaal 3" enters a hitherto uncharted territory. Madhav (Warsi), Laxman (Khemu) and Lucky (Kapoor) are the three scheming sons of Pritam (Mithun) who manage to lure Vasooli (Mukesh Tiwari) into one scheme after another.
However, as luck would have it, in everything they start, they find competition from three other down-on-their-luck kids Gopal (Ajay Devgn), Laxman (Shreyas Talapade) and Dabbu (Kareena Kapoor) with funding from Puppy bhai (Johnny Lever). Gopal and Laxman are the sons of Geeta (Ratna Pathak Shah).
Inevitably, locking horns they end up destroying each others businesses. What the two groups don't know is that their parents are unrequited ex-lovers.
When Dabbu finds out she schemes and unites the two lovers in a marriage without letting their children know about their step-brothers.
All hell breaks loose when they finally find out and a hilarious war engulfs between the two groups right under their parents noses.
Like its predecessors "Golmaal 3" has enough laughs going through the film to keep the momentum.
Johnny Lever as the Ghajini-style forgetful don who adopts a new filmy avatar every few minutes has the audience in splits.
The few spoofs of old Hindi films, full of camera pans and quick zooms, will nostalgically tickle the funny bone. The twists of various popular phrases and known adages, raises more than a chuckle.
Mithun gets to do his "Disco Dancer" once again. Theatre veteran Ratna Pathak-Shah waltzes through the film with aplomb. Arshad Warsi is his usual tapori self while Shreyas Talapade and Kunal Khemu do a good job.
It is however the beefed up Tushar Kapoor who seems to be trying too hard, and despite raising giggles, fails to arouse laughter. In the first part he, looking the most vulnerable, was the funniest of the lot.
Director Rohit Shetty tries his best in merging comic vignettes into one comprehensible film. However, had it not been for the funny dialogues, his lack of directorial verve would have shone out.
He is spared the fate by some ingenious dialogue writing by Robin Bhatt ("Aashiqui", "Sadak", "Baazigar") and Yunus Sajawal.
Now that Bollywood finally has a trilogy, will it please also make one that also has some real standing in the world of cinema?
Action Replayy Movie Review
Harry Potter And The Deathly Hallows: Part 1
483 People Rated:Having read the entire Harry Potter series I am a fan of the highest order and am a little skeptical towards the movies. Apart from the 1st and 3rd, Harry movies have been a tad disappointing. The 7th edition has been decided to be split into two parts so that none of the details are left out. It would have been better if the 5th and 6th books might have shown some of these concepts and the last installment would have been out and out action.
The movie kicks off from where the last ended. Dumbledore is dead and Voldomort's 'sena' has attacked the muggle world. The ministry is defeated and Voldomort has a license to kill Harry. Harry is distraught after Dumbledore's death and seeks out with Ron and Hermoine to hunt down the horcruxes and destroy them one by one. During his journey he learns about the 3 deathly hallows, an elder wand (the most powerful wand in the wizardry world), a resurrection stone that can bring back the dead and an invisibility cloak. All three put together are enough to defeat Death. The movie ends with Voldomort discovering that it was Dumbledore who possessed the elder wand last and opens up his grave to claim the elder wand for himself. The saga will take off from here to unveil some secrets in the final installment of Harry.
I remember when I had finished reading the deathly hallows, the feeling was like something or someone's life's journey had ended in my real life. I was so attached to the characters that they were a part of my life. For some reason I have not been able to connect to the cinematic characters to that extent due to which I am never overwhelmed by the HP movies.
Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson and Rupert Grint share the maximum screen time in this one. All of them do a decent job. Rupert Grint steals the show as far as acting is concerned.
Screenplay writer Steve Kloves and director David Yates stay true to the book and bring the pages to visual scenes. I must admit attention to detail is given for the first time in a Harry Potter series but they had the leisure of splitting this book into 2 parts. The core story for the Deathly Hallows by Rowling is so mind blowing that it would take some really bad direction to screw it up and if one does so it would be a sin as far as HP fans are concerned.
All said and done this is one of the better Harry Potter movies that have been churned out in the recent past.
Rating:
HP fan? You dont need this review to watch it.
Love effects? Watch it in an IMAX screen
Love fantasy movies? Don't miss
Hate HP series? You don't need a review to NOT watch it.
Repeat Value: Several times.
Guzaarish
Guzaarish
825 People Rated:
Shahrukh Bola Khoobsurat Hai Tu
Shahrukh Bola Khoobsurat Hai Tu
160 People Rated:If I sound gloomy, I conveniently blame it on the film. It involves Lali(Preetika Chawla), a flower seller at one of Mumbai's traffic signals, and John(Afzal khan), also a signal vendor. Lali catches SRK's eye at the signal and from the looks of it, also when hes in a great mood. Because he complements on her beauty- which forms the metaphor for a window into Mumbai's dirty underbelly. Lali and John have an unconsummated love story for the most part, along with half a score of inconsequential, slum-dweller characters- including the bhai gangs, a reporter digging out stories, Hindi speaking German, bar girls etc. It meanders from one inexplicable scene to another with just one constant- Lalis love for SRK. The most gripping scene, in fact, comes courtesy DDLJ- when Lali watches it wide-eyed.
Disappointed as I am, I do believe its a potentially good idea wasted. If you still insist on taking something 'relatable' away from the film, let it be the fact that your self-esteem changes when someone you admire genuinely complements you. Your mom, boss, lover, mentor-anyone. Thats what happens to Lali- Shah Rukh ne bola mai khubsurat hooon, aur mai ho gayi.
Yes, potentially beautiful theme wasted. Sad.
But I do however, agree that Preetika Chawla can pass off as cute. I have a feeling we'll see more of her. So wait till then-she might also lose the puppy fat and the South Mumbai accent which doesn't suit her slum dweller role.
Don't watch. Watch another DDLJ rerun maybe. Or get a pup. Anything.
Sukanya Verma reviews Harry Potter [ Images ] and the Deathly Hallows Part I.
Growing up with a series, especially a fantasy can be quite an intimate experience. Gratifying because of the spectacular adventures it unfolds, changing its course through the years, as well as heartbreaking for it's not permanent.
After all, what can be more emotional than seeing the improbable turn true even if it's just a timeless tale of good vs evil told with a bright new perspective in a fictional universe around ingenious characters and creatures? Be it Star Wars [ Images ], Lord of the Rings, Shrek or Harry Potter, even though they belong to varying degrees of drama and genre, the extraordinary bond produced between these cinematic volumes and the wide-eyed viewer is one and the same -- wonderful to encounter, impossible to explain and painful to let go.
As a subscriber of this school of thought, I stepped out to see the screen adaptation of J K Rowling's [ Images ] seventh and final book in the series -- Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 1 with a mix of 'OMG, I am watching Harry Potter three days before its nationwide release' and 'Sigh, this is *almost* it' enveloping my being.
Hogwarts teachers like Snape (Alan Rickman [ Images ]) or Umbridge (Stauton) don't grab much screen time unlike the plot's more bizarre creations -- death eater Bellatrix (Helena Bonham Carter [ Images ] is lusciously ruthless) and Dobby-the elf (a Toby Jones-voiced CGI spectacle, curious and endearing as ever).
A Flat Movie Reviews
By Taran Adarsh, November 12, 2010 - 12:58 ISTCall it a coincidence, most Hindi films focus on haunted homes when it comes to the horror genre. A FLAT is no different. In fact, it brings back memories of various films, including BHOOT [was it shot in the same housing complex?] and also Chetan Anand's multi-starrer KUDRAT. Of course, it wouldn't be right to compare A FLAT with BHOOT or KUDRAT or even VAASTU SHASTRA or 13-B or PHOONK/PHOONK 2 because the plotline of each is different, although you can't ignore the uncanny resemblance with the finale of KUDRAT.
| Write your own movie review of A Flat |
A spate of unexpected events jolts Rahul [Jimmy Shergill] as soon as he lands from U.S. to pacify his lost love Preeti [Kaveri Jha]. First, the mysterious death of his dad [Sachin Khedekar], when he visits the flat, followed by the baffling disappearance of Preeti… and now Rahul finds himself trapped in his own flat, completely cut off from the world. The only companion he has is a ghost.
The film also suffers due to miscasting. Hazel doesn't look like a village belle from any angle. Besides, the rural accent makes it worse. Ditto for Sanjay Suri, who tries so hard to look the evil guy, but he doesn't. The romantic relationship between Jimmy and Kaveri Jha is half-baked, while the conclusion, though well shot, is similar to KUDRAT. Musically, nothing to hum about. The cinematography is striking; the scenic locales of North India are well captured on celluloid.
Talking of performances, Jimmy does reasonably well, while Sanjay doesn't look convincing. Kaveri Jha seems confident. Sachin Khedekar is alright. Nasser Abdullah is strictly okay.
On the whole, A FLAT fails to create an impact.
Dunno Y Na Jaane Kyun... Movie Reviews
Dunno Y Na Jaane Kyun...
By Taran Adarsh, November 12, 2010 - 12:59 ISTIn an informal chat with me a few months ago, after watching DUNNO Y... NA JAANE KYUN at a private screening, director Sanjay Sharma enlightened me that his endeavour in making the film is to drive home the fact that there's nothing anomalous about being homosexual. "Through this film, I want to highlight and draw attention to the relationships between gay people. Their sentiments and emotions. The idea is not to poke fun at the gay community. In fact, the intent is to make a film that looks at the issue and the gay community in a very serious perspective," he remarked.
| Write your own movie review of Dunno Y Na Jaane Kyun... |
Homosexuality is still taboo in India and DUNNO Y... NA JAANE KYUN attempts to tell a story that's shades different from FIRE and GIRLFRIEND or even BROKEBACK MOUNTAIN. Engaging at times, but amateurish at places, the film has the courage to go where most Hindi films have not dared to enter. The writing [script: Kapil Sharma] holds your interest in most parts.
The storyline follows a gay model forced to compromise his morals for his career. He then forms an intimate relationship with another man, who is already married and lives with his family. It would be interesting to see whether our mainstream Indian audience is open to see a film on such issues, though the film also captures the multi-layered relationship within an Anglo-Indian family.
Both Kapil Sharma and Yuvraaj Parashar come up with sensitive and daring performances. The film marks the return of Zeenat Aman [excellent] on the silver screen, besides an ensemble cast of Helen [good], Rituparna Sengupta [first-rate], Kabir Bedi [perfect], Maradona Rebello [confident], Aryan Vaid [okay], Tara Sharma [alright], Asha Sachdev [fair], Hazel [hardly there], Mahabanoo Kotwal [good], Viveck Vaswani [adequate] and Parikshat Sahni [wasted].
On the whole, DUNNO Y... NA JAANE KYUN is an honest attempt. Sure, it's not a perfect film, but at least it makes a sincere attempt to highlight the issue.
Ramaa - The Saviour Movie Reviews
By Taran Adarsh, November 12, 2010 - 13:01 ISTWe often grumble that we don't make films targeted at kids, unlike the West where this genre has cut across barriers and reached out to not only kids, but also teens and adults. RAMAA - THE SAVIOUR tries to go into a zone where no Hindi film has visited in the past: Video gaming.
But a terrific idea is no guarantee for a terrific film. Everything depends on how gripping and absorbing the screenplay is and how deftly the director executes the subject material. RAMAA - THE SAVIOUR has some attention-grabbing moments, but they are few and far between.
| Write your own movie review of Ramaa - The Saviour |
It's a tough call to cast the right faces when you set out to attempt a kiddie film. They need to look the parts, but most importantly, live the parts as well. The kids in RAMAA - THE SAVIOUR pass the test with good marks.
But it's the writing that plays a spoilsport and doesn't do justice to the concept and the efforts invested in the project. Let me explain. To start with, there should have been some detailing on the protagonist [Sahil Khan], who comes across as a mix of Tarzan and Conan The Barbarian. He has the ability to connect via telepathy with humans and animals, we're told, but what is he doing in the secluded island-jungle? Besides, what's Vali's [Khali] connection with Ramaa? Also, why were they fighting in the first place? Is Vali human or demon or spirit? Tanushree's character isn't well penned either. She belongs to the evil camp, but crosses over to Ramaa's side without any valid justification.
Sahil Khan exhibits his physique to the optimum, but the screenplay doesn't offer him scope to exhibit histrionics. Tanushree surprises in action scenes. She's wonderful. The new villain, Taleb, looks ferocious. Khali is okay. The kids, all of them, are super confident.
On the whole, RAMAA - THE SAVIOUR isn't convincing.
