Latest News
Showing posts with label Movie Reviews. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Movie Reviews. Show all posts

Allah Ke Banday Movie Review

Posted by Vinay Sharma on Saturday, November 27, 2010 , under | comments (0)




Allah Ke Banday

Allah Ke BandayStarring: Naseeruddin Shah, Sharman Joshi, Faruk Kabir

Written & Directed by Faruk Kabir

Rating: ***

A feeling of foreboding and damnation builds up in the narration from the first frame itself. Here’s a gloriously gutsy film exploring the underbelly of Mumbai through the lives of two slumkids who grow up in identical circumstances but with somewhat disparate values.

First-time director Faruk Kabir displays remarkable skill in creating a pastiche of mammoth crime and little punishment. The pace leaves meager space for grace. And yet Allah Ke Bande creates a world filled with acute aggression repression and damnation with a reasonable amount of paciness to the edgy narrative.

The world that Faruk Kabir’s characters inhabit is reminiscent of Danny Boyle’s Slumdog Millionaire, Irrfan Kamal’s underrated Thanks, Maa, Mahesh Manjrekar’s City Of Gold and Chandan Arora’s Striker. Deriving its lingering study of juvenile delinquency from these sources Allah Ke Banday moves forward and acquires a life of its own.

The gripping narrative takes us through the world of petty crime and underage lawlessness non-judgementally. Faruk Kabir’s deeply-felt concern for children who dodder dangerously on the edge of society is never over-done. This is a hard and disturbing look-see at quicksand existence. The director creates a world of uncertainties with unwavering confidence.

The nervous anxiety of the characters is rather aptly replicated in the film’s rough and unvarnished look. Kabir’s cameraman Vishal Sinha goes through the rugged merciless slums searching for only Allah-knows what.

The actors wear their unwashed demeanour casually, so much so that at times we forget the existence of the camera. At the same time there are uneven sections in the narrative that mar what could otherwise have been a stand-out exposition on the genesis of social outcasts.

Sharman Joshi and Faruk Kabir play the two driving forces of the plot with a deep understanding of their characters and the milieu. Both seem to have got right their characters’ physicality and then proceeded to explore their inner worlds. For a first-time actor and director Faruk Kabir handles both his jobs with more than a reasonable amount of compelling confidence.

The others in the cast merge into the relentless mileu. As usual the extraordinarily brilliant Naseeruddin Shah is under-used. Whenever he shows up on screen an extra dimension is effortlessly added to the proceedings.

Notches above the run-of-the-mill entertainer Allah Ke Banday reveals a genuine concern for juvenile delinquency. The lives on the streets never looked more dangerous and less glamorous. This time crime is not glorified. Thank God for small mercies.

Break Ke Baad Movie Reviews

Posted by Vinay Sharma on , under | comments (0)



Break KE BaadBy Vinay sharma

Cast: Imran Khan, Deepika Padukone, Sharmila Tagore, Lillete Dubea, Shahana Goswami, Navin Nischol, Yudhistir Urs

Director: Danish Aslam

Rating: ** 1/2

Bollywood has a sub-genre of romantic-comedies meant for urban, chic teenagers, first pioneered with its full frontal glory by our very own coffee drinking Karan Johar.

These films, and the people that inhabit it, are nothing like you have ever known, or are ever likely to know. But the reality inside it is so glossy and Cinderellaesque that everyone aspires for this free floating, un-rooted, but super fun unreality.

"Break Ke Baad" is a fun example of that.

Aaliya (Deepika Padukone) and Abhay (Imran Khan) are childhood sweethearts whose sweet course of sugarcane love encounters the roadblock of youthful ambition. Aaliya, a fiercely independent, risk-taking person decides to go to Australia to pursue her acting ambition, thus breaking the relationship. Both make mistakes, but eventually discover themselves only to realize that it's not that easy to say 'talaq' to a love, that has now matured.

"Break Ke Baad" is the ultimate, teenage, escape, love fantasy of 2010, much like "Jaane Tu…" in 2008 and "Love Aaj Kal" in 2009, in whose magical world, almost everything happens coincidentally and all loose ends are tied up perfectly in the end and all that you see makes sense. But we know that such a mythical, unreality can exist only in Bollywood.

Yet, the film is good in its own sub-genre. The strongest part of the film is a well-baked script; tight, crisp and thankfully contemporary and often rooted dialogues of Renuka Kunzru, which are funny at times, and profound in a cliched way at others.

Yet the film will never make it to the annals of Bollywood greats. Neither does it have the cuteness of Aamir Khan's launch vehicle "Qayamat Se Qayamat Tak", or the undertone of class struggle depicted with extreme melodrama in "Maine Pyaar Kiya", the overtone of struggle against tradition of "Dilwale Dulhania Le Jayenge" or the excessive sugar-pulp and totally nonexistent reality of "Kuch Kuch Hota Hai" (KKHH) - a film which this one pays hearty tributes to.

The conflict is mostly in the minds of the protagonist, and not real. Ironically its fault would perhaps be that it is not unreal enough like KKHH.

Though the characterizations, at least in the beginning and in a few side characters, has the smell (or stench if you consider the escapist drama) of reality, it flies off to KKHH land. At least the old films were caricatures, exaggerations of people you would have encountered somewhere. No such luck with "Break Ke Baad".

But it is fodder for teen fantasy, seeped in the dual confusion of maturing while finding true love. It's over two hour ride is fun, full time-pass and paisa vasool.

Golmaal 3 Movie Review

Posted by Vinay Sharma on Friday, November 26, 2010 , under , | comments (0)



Golmaal 3By Satyen K. Bordoloi

Cast: Kareena Kapoor, Ajay Devgn, Mithun Chakraborty, Kunal Khemu, Tusshar Kapoor, Arshad Warsi, Johny Lever, Ratna Pathak-Shah

Director: Rohit Shetty

Rating: ***

It is touted as the first trilogy of Indian cinema. It's about time that the distant cousin of Hollywood had one. Yet, what's important is that Bollywood did not need to have trilogies as one hit film has the habit of spawning a whole generation of films that look and feel like the original. "Golmaal 3" also suffers from that syndrome. Thankfully, it only feels like its previous avatars.

Despite retaining most characters from its previous outings, "Golmaal 3" enters a hitherto uncharted territory. Madhav (Warsi), Laxman (Khemu) and Lucky (Kapoor) are the three scheming sons of Pritam (Mithun) who manage to lure Vasooli (Mukesh Tiwari) into one scheme after another.

However, as luck would have it, in everything they start, they find competition from three other down-on-their-luck kids Gopal (Ajay Devgn), Laxman (Shreyas Talapade) and Dabbu (Kareena Kapoor) with funding from Puppy bhai (Johnny Lever). Gopal and Laxman are the sons of Geeta (Ratna Pathak Shah).

Inevitably, locking horns they end up destroying each others businesses. What the two groups don't know is that their parents are unrequited ex-lovers.

When Dabbu finds out she schemes and unites the two lovers in a marriage without letting their children know about their step-brothers.

All hell breaks loose when they finally find out and a hilarious war engulfs between the two groups right under their parents noses.

Like its predecessors "Golmaal 3" has enough laughs going through the film to keep the momentum.

Johnny Lever as the Ghajini-style forgetful don who adopts a new filmy avatar every few minutes has the audience in splits.

The few spoofs of old Hindi films, full of camera pans and quick zooms, will nostalgically tickle the funny bone. The twists of various popular phrases and known adages, raises more than a chuckle.

Mithun gets to do his "Disco Dancer" once again. Theatre veteran Ratna Pathak-Shah waltzes through the film with aplomb. Arshad Warsi is his usual tapori self while Shreyas Talapade and Kunal Khemu do a good job.

It is however the beefed up Tushar Kapoor who seems to be trying too hard, and despite raising giggles, fails to arouse laughter. In the first part he, looking the most vulnerable, was the funniest of the lot.

Director Rohit Shetty tries his best in merging comic vignettes into one comprehensible film. However, had it not been for the funny dialogues, his lack of directorial verve would have shone out.

He is spared the fate by some ingenious dialogue writing by Robin Bhatt ("Aashiqui", "Sadak", "Baazigar") and Yunus Sajawal.

Now that Bollywood finally has a trilogy, will it please also make one that also has some real standing in the world of cinema?

Action Replayy Movie Review

Posted by Vinay Sharma on , under | comments (0)



Action Replayy

Action ReplayyBy Satyen K. Bordoloi

Cast: Aishwarya Rai, Akshay Kumar, Aditya Roy Kapoor

Director: Vipul Amrutlal Shah

Rating: **

Hollywood and Bollywood, despite similarities in their names, hardly have anything in common. Except that the latter often borrows concepts from its older cousin. Yet, it manages to make something different from the original. "Action Replayy" is an example of that.

When proposed to, Bunty (Aditya Roy Kapoor) refuses to marry his girlfriend because he has seen his parents Kishan (Akshay Kumar) and Mala (Aishwarya Rai) fight since he was born. Even on their 35th marriage anniversary, they fight as if they were sworn enemies. A determined Bunty steals a ride on a time machine invented by his girlfriend's grandfather to go back in time to make it all right.

Doing this will be tougher than he had imagined as he finds his parents very different from what they are today. Parenting ones parents, Bunty would realise, is the toughest job in the whole wide world.

The basic premise isn't new. Even before "Back To The Future" made it famous, travelling to the past to correct one's present was staple food of science fictions. It is, after all, the ultimate human fantasy.

What is new is how "Action Replayy" lays bare the difference between two of the biggest commercial filmmaking centres of the world, Hollywood and Bollywood. While in "Back To The Future" the stress is on science fiction and survival of the time traveller, here it is on human relations and the various emotions associated with it.

Also the paper thin, cliched villains of the film shows that Bollywood is still in a time-wrap. But "Action Replayy" can perhaps afford to, it being a time-wrap story and all.

Lot of efforts have been made to get the sets right, and surprisingly it often works. Vignettes of ancient advertisements, painstakingly made a part of the set by the filmmakers, make it a thrill to watch, especially for those from that era.
The costumes, however, try too hard to be retro. If you watch films of those period, they were not so flowery and jazzy as in this film. However, given the lighter vein in which the film is made, it is perhaps justified. Aishwarya and Akshay are as good as Bollywood can get, which isn't much. Pritam's music is average and only when we do an action replay from the high plinth of the future, will we come to know the corners of the world he has plagiarised from.  Few spoofs are hilarious, especially the one on the Gujarati band led by Mahesh Kumar whose brother can sing in two voices. The one where the son is desperately trying to make his retro father understand the concept of sex and uses the typical Hindi film analogy of two flowers meeting is a laugh-riot.  Despite this the film misses many opportunities for gags that can easily be part of a time travel film. Just the inclusion of names common today like Obama, Mallika Sherawat, Saif Ali Khan etc., does not necessarily make it humorous.  "Action Replayy" despite its best intentions and few successes, fails in many others. Perhaps it will take someone else to say action-reply and better the present for Bollywood

Posted by Vinay Sharma on , under , | comments (0)










































Having read the entire Harry Potter series I am a fan of the highest order and am a little skeptical towards the movies. Apart from the 1st and 3rd, Harry movies have been a tad disappointing. The 7th edition has been decided to be split into two parts so that none of the details are left out. It would have been better if the 5th and 6th books might have shown some of these concepts and the last installment would have been out and out action.

The movie kicks off from where the last ended. Dumbledore is dead and Voldomort's 'sena' has attacked the muggle world. The ministry is defeated and Voldomort has a license to kill Harry. Harry is distraught after Dumbledore's death and seeks out with Ron and Hermoine to hunt down the horcruxes and destroy them one by one. During his journey he learns about the 3 deathly hallows, an elder wand (the most powerful wand in the wizardry world), a resurrection stone that can bring back the dead and an invisibility cloak. All three put together are enough to defeat Death. The movie ends with Voldomort discovering that it was Dumbledore who possessed the elder wand last and opens up his grave to claim the elder wand for himself. The saga will take off from here to unveil some secrets in the final installment of Harry.

I remember when I had finished reading the deathly hallows, the feeling was like something or someone's life's journey had ended in my real life. I was so attached to the characters that they were a part of my life. For some reason I have not been able to connect to the cinematic characters to that extent due to which I am never overwhelmed by the HP movies.

Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson and Rupert Grint share the maximum screen time in this one. All of them do a decent job. Rupert Grint steals the show as far as acting is concerned.

Screenplay writer Steve Kloves and director David Yates stay true to the book and bring the pages to visual scenes. I must admit attention to detail is given for the first time in a Harry Potter series but they had the leisure of splitting this book into 2 parts. The core story for the Deathly Hallows by Rowling is so mind blowing that it would take some really bad direction to screw it up and if one does so it would be a sin as far as HP fans are concerned.

All said and done this is one of the better Harry Potter movies that have been churned out in the recent past.

Rating: 

HP fan? You dont need this review to watch it.
Love effects? Watch it in an IMAX screen
Love fantasy movies? Don't miss
Hate HP series? You don't need a review to NOT watch it.

Repeat Value: Several times.







Guzaarish

Posted by Vinay Sharma on , under , | comments (0)







Guzaarish

825 People Rated:
What exactly is the purpose of the existence of 'Guzaarish'?  It is a Bollywood film, so commercial and critical fame obviously top the list in that order. Is it perhaps Bhansali's attempt to regain past glory post the disaster that was 'Saawariya' (2007)? Could be some wanton urge of Mr. Roshan to show to the world that he too can act; characters with disabilities aren't the prerogative of only Khans. Maybe the Goa tourism board needed one hell of an expensive advertisement....that doesn't really show Goa. Maybe Mr. Bhansali just wanted to make the audience weep like babies; make you reach for those handkerchiefs at the drop of a hat. There could be a thousand reasons, but for me it only serves as a reminder of the pretentious nature of Sanjay Leela Bhansali who in his career has only sought to shamelessly pilfer movies outright from across the globe (including old Bollywood films) and present them as schmaltzy overblown intellectual films with a so called heart. Not to forget the strange la-la land most of his movies are set in where flowing drapes, the color blue and vintage houses seem to be in overwhelming abundance.  Having watched 'The Sea Inside' I'm going to be blunt, 'Guzaarish' doesn't even come close to matching the emotional appeal or connect the former film created with me. For a long time after I had watched 'The Sea Inside', it affected me on a level raising questions that only instigated some sense of personal morality in me. Right, wrong, everything seemed to merge into one in an attempt to find my own answer for an invisible question omnipresent in the movie but never thrust in your face.  What if I hadn't watched 'The Sea Inside'? 'Guzaarish' would still fail to convincingly address its own core issues. The primary plots being of euthanasia & the budding romance between Ethan & Sofia. In trying to make the movie far more accessible to the general audience, the movie simplifies the concept too thus creating a superficial monster that's all talk and no show. The romance is never allowed to blossom properly, the emotional connect is far too superficial. Just watch the unintentionally hilarious penultimate scene that's as much an attempt to make you cry as an ode to American Football.  The sub-plot about magic and passing on the torch of wisdom to another is pure hokum. Not a shred of credibility exists for anyone even remotely aware of the tricks of the world of professional magicians. Plus the hurried manner in which the eager apprentice's woes are resolved only makes you wonder, when did that happen?  Life is worth living is repeated over and over again, but none of the characters can make a strong enough point for the case; neither do they manage to put up a convincing argument for Ethan wanting to end his life. Yes, he is quadriplegic but hes been like that for 14 years, so did he just wake up one day and decide he wants to kill himself? If one court rejects it, hasn't anyone heard of appealing in a higher court? Oh wait I forgot this is la-la land, Bhansali's wonderland, wheres hes judge, jury and executioner. While the cinematography is good and the film looks beautiful; its all make believe. Making already picturesque locations look beautiful should be the least a competent cinematographer can achieve. The indoor sets are a treat to behold for their Victorian elegance but lack any sense of time, place, purpose or people. What was wrong with everyone's clothing sense in the film? The music is below-par and not a single song did I find hummable.  Hrithik Roshan huffs and puffs with wide eyes through the role, though he fares better in the comic moments. But his uncharacteristic smiles & laughter when compared to the dead-pan look on other quadriplegics, seem pretty over-the-top similar in the vein of Mr. Khan's 'hey-look-I'm-acting' bit in the underwhelming 'My Name is Khan'. The physical characteristics of a quadriplegic are not totally convincing either (though if I hadn't seen 'The Sea Inside' I might not been able to gauge). Aishwarya Rai Bachchan fares somewhat better, but still suffers from her 'tilt-head-when-emotional' syndrome of acting. Aditya Roy Kapoor grins his way through yet another mediocre performance while Shernaz Patel's truly hilarious scene occurs when she stuffs her mouth with a piece of toast right in the middle of an emotional outburst; Though credit should go to her for having not choked on the bread. Ash Chandler in a cameo appearance would be guaranteed to walk away with this year's Worst Actor Award and Worst Hairstyle awards if there were any.  Rather than watching this pretentious excess of emotional artillery directed straight at your tear ducts, go an rent a copy of The Sea Inside and know that real cinema doesn't come in blue bubble-gum wrap. 

Shahrukh Bola Khoobsurat Hai Tu

Posted by Vinay Sharma on , under , | comments (0)



Shahrukh Bola Khoobsurat Hai Tu

160 People Rated:
There are movies, and then there are bad movies. A peculiar shade of bad raises your expectations and by the 10th minute, brings them crashing down. These movies are, for the most part, a good kid gone wrong. They make you frown at the makers motivation for making them. People who pay for them and watch expecting to have a good time are utterly disappointed. It casts a spell of doom that all the 30-40 people walking out of the hall share(because that's usually the maximum number they attract, which includes rich wastrels or couples).

If I sound gloomy, I conveniently blame it on the film. It involves Lali(Preetika Chawla), a flower seller at one of Mumbai's traffic signals, and John(Afzal khan), also a signal vendor. Lali catches SRK's eye at the signal and from the looks of it, also when hes in a great mood. Because he complements on her beauty- which forms the metaphor for a window into Mumbai's dirty underbelly. Lali and John have an unconsummated love story for the most part, along with half a score of inconsequential, slum-dweller characters- including the bhai gangs, a reporter digging out stories, Hindi speaking German, bar girls etc. It meanders from one inexplicable scene to another with just one constant- Lalis love for SRK. The most gripping scene, in fact, comes courtesy DDLJ- when Lali watches it wide-eyed. 

Disappointed as I am, I do believe its a potentially good idea wasted. If you still insist on taking something 'relatable' away from the film, let it be the fact that your self-esteem changes when someone you admire genuinely complements you. Your mom, boss, lover, mentor-anyone. Thats what happens to Lali- Shah Rukh ne bola mai khubsurat hooon, aur mai ho gayi.

Yes, potentially beautiful theme wasted. Sad.

But I do however, agree that Preetika Chawla can pass off as cute. I have a feeling we'll see more of her. So wait till then-she might also lose the puppy fat and the South Mumbai accent which doesn't suit her slum dweller role.

Don't watch. Watch another DDLJ rerun maybe. Or get a pup. Anything.

Sukanya Verma reviews Harry Potter [ Images ] and the Deathly Hallows Part I.

Posted by Vinay Sharma on Tuesday, November 16, 2010 , under , | comments (0)



A scene from Harry Potter And The Deathly HallowsSukanya Verma reviews Harry Potter [ Images ] and the Deathly Hallows Part I. 

Growing up with a series, especially a fantasy can be quite an intimate experience. Gratifying because of the spectacular adventures it unfolds, changing its course through the years, as well as heartbreaking for it's not permanent.

After all, what can be more emotional than seeing the improbable turn true even if it's just a timeless tale of good vs evil told with a bright new perspective in a fictional universe around ingenious characters and creatures? Be it Star Wars [ Images ], Lord of the Rings, Shrek or Harry Potter, even though they belong to varying degrees of drama and genre, the extraordinary bond produced between these cinematic volumes and the wide-eyed viewer is one and the same -- wonderful to encounter, impossible to explain and painful to let go.

As a subscriber of this school of thought, I stepped out to see the screen adaptation of J K Rowling's [ Images ] seventh and final book in the series -- Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 1 with a mix of 'OMG, I am watching Harry Potter three days before its nationwide release' and 'Sigh, this is *almost* it' enveloping my being.
On account of its sprawling content, the makers decided to split the novel into two movies. While this is simply practical and profitable for franchise expanding studio sharks but where fans are concerned, this reads as yet another year of Potter-filled flurry. So, woo hoo!
Speaking of which, there's a plenty to cheer about in the latest installment. Director David Yates [ Images ] returns to helm the further murky tones of the story as it meets it part-climax wherein key protagonists deal with adolescence issues coupled with their impatient hunt for horcruxes, enchanted receptacles that store and preserve Lord Voldemort's (Ralph Fiennes) immortality.  
A scene from Harry Potter And The Deathly HallowsEven though Harry (Daniel Radcliffe [ Images ]) and his trusty pals -- Ron (Rupert Grint [ Images ]) and Hermione (Emma Watson [ Images ]) skip the Hogwarts corridors to tussle against outdoor perils, there's no shortage of breathtaking spells and relentless horror.
Some of the coolest sequences involve a jaw-dropping chase between the death eaters and multiple Harry Potters, the troika's disguised entry and escape from the Ministry of Magic in a bid to steal Salazar Slytherin's locket ,a brilliantly animated interlude narrating 'The Tale of the Three Brothers' and Nagini's petrifying assault on a shell-shocked Harry.
Thankfully, all this, especially the last mentioned bit, does not occur in 3D as previously planned. Be warned, not everyone has the stomach to endure the furious thrills that follow every time Voldemort's enormous snake makes an appearance.
And while Voldemort only shows up during the first and final scene, his towering baritone and intimidating personality more than make up for the break. Fiennes conducts the foul-faced antagonist with such exquisite terror and theatrical charisma; he's assured to earn a seat in the realm of cinema's greatest villains.
As always, a great number of secondary characters, essayed by esteemed British actors, clutter the frames but for those unfamiliar with Rowling's broad database, their sudden entry/exit might seem rather confounding. Those falling under the said category, try to enjoy this like a great, big riddle-solving quest involving three teenagers and several monster-faced obstacles.

Hogwarts teachers like Snape (Alan Rickman [ Images ]) or Umbridge (Stauton) don't grab much screen time unlike the plot's more bizarre creations -- death eater Bellatrix (Helena Bonham Carter [ Images ] is lusciously ruthless) and Dobby-the elf (a Toby Jones-voiced CGI spectacle, curious and endearing as ever).
A scene from Harry Potter And The Deathly HallowsThough still awkward when it comes to communicating lovey-dovey sentiments, the young trio of Radcliffe, Grint and Watson shares a rare camaraderie, which is far too compelling to dismiss as commonplace. Of the three, Watson, an enviable blend of vulnerable and fiery, continues to be the one to look out for.
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, even in its unfinished state, is masterfully structured into three acts that fulfills the expectations of action-packed wizardry without neglecting the fragile core that lends the film its true soul. I'd go to the extent of calling it the best one in the series.
Having witnessed the progression of Harry, Ron and Hermione from squabbling children to definitive individuals, Yates understands the need to explain the blossoming of the three friends, their fragile equations, bubbling insecurities and everlasting bond through a tenderly executed middle half against a gorgeously stark backdrop.
The symbolism isn't lost on the discerning viewer. If at all it only adds to the anticipation and promise of a memorable grand finale.

A Flat Movie Reviews

Posted by Vinay Sharma on Friday, November 12, 2010 , under | comments (0)



By Taran Adarsh, November 12, 2010 - 12:58 IST


Call it a coincidence, most Hindi films focus on haunted homes when it comes to the horror genre. A FLAT is no different. In fact, it brings back memories of various films, including BHOOT [was it shot in the same housing complex?] and also Chetan Anand's multi-starrer KUDRAT. Of course, it wouldn't be right to compare A FLAT with BHOOT or KUDRAT or even VAASTU SHASTRA or 13-B or PHOONK/PHOONK 2 because the plotline of each is different, although you can't ignore the uncanny resemblance with the finale of KUDRAT.

Write your own movie review of A Flat
A horror films works if it scares the living daylights out of you, if it succeeds in giving you goose bumps at vital points of the narrative, but barring a scene or two in A FLAT [I'd like to single out the elevator sequence involving Jimmy Shergill], you don't break into a cold sweat or bite your nails in anxiety. The writing is clearly the problem here, which follows the beaten path in its post-interval portions.
A spate of unexpected events jolts Rahul [Jimmy Shergill] as soon as he lands from U.S. to pacify his lost love Preeti [Kaveri Jha]. First, the mysterious death of his dad [Sachin Khedekar], when he visits the flat, followed by the baffling disappearance of Preeti… and now Rahul finds himself trapped in his own flat, completely cut off from the world. The only companion he has is a ghost.

Debutant director Hemant Madhukar's choice of subject lacks novelty, which explains why the film doesn't hold your attention after you are introduced to the characters and setting. Besides, the director uses the usual tricks that are mandatory in horror movies - hand-held camera movements, loud background score and sound effects, a scary looking spirit - but let's not forget that these factors work only if the written material is convincing, which, unfortunately, isn't the case here.

The film also suffers due to miscasting. Hazel doesn't look like a village belle from any angle. Besides, the rural accent makes it worse. Ditto for Sanjay Suri, who tries so hard to look the evil guy, but he doesn't. The romantic relationship between Jimmy and Kaveri Jha is half-baked, while the conclusion, though well shot, is similar to KUDRAT. Musically, nothing to hum about. The cinematography is striking; the scenic locales of North India are well captured on celluloid.

Talking of performances, Jimmy does reasonably well, while Sanjay doesn't look convincing. Kaveri Jha seems confident. Sachin Khedekar is alright. Nasser Abdullah is strictly okay.

On the whole, A FLAT fails to create an impact. 

Dunno Y Na Jaane Kyun... Movie Reviews

Posted by Vinay Sharma on , under | comments (0)



Dunno Y Na Jaane Kyun... 


By Taran Adarsh, November 12, 2010 - 12:59 IST


In an informal chat with me a few months ago, after watching DUNNO Y... NA JAANE KYUN at a private screening, director Sanjay Sharma enlightened me that his endeavour in making the film is to drive home the fact that there's nothing anomalous about being homosexual. "Through this film, I want to highlight and draw attention to the relationships between gay people. Their sentiments and emotions. The idea is not to poke fun at the gay community. In fact, the intent is to make a film that looks at the issue and the gay community in a very serious perspective," he remarked.

Write your own movie review of Dunno Y Na Jaane Kyun...
Very noble intentions, I must pronounce, but do the gracious objectives of the director that he sets out to achieve come across effectively on celluloid? Does the film come across as an emotional, sensitive and a ground-breaking experience? Let me attempt to examine...
Homosexuality is still taboo in India and DUNNO Y... NA JAANE KYUN attempts to tell a story that's shades different from FIRE and GIRLFRIEND or even BROKEBACK MOUNTAIN. Engaging at times, but amateurish at places, the film has the courage to go where most Hindi films have not dared to enter. The writing [script: Kapil Sharma] holds your interest in most parts.

The storyline follows a gay model forced to compromise his morals for his career. He then forms an intimate relationship with another man, who is already married and lives with his family. It would be interesting to see whether our mainstream Indian audience is open to see a film on such issues, though the film also captures the multi-layered relationship within an Anglo-Indian family.

Director Sanjay Sharma has handled a few sensitive sequences well, but the writing, which should've focused on the main plot, drifts into plots of the numerous family members. The songs are melodious. The Lata Mangeshkar track is soothing and the pick of the lot.

Both Kapil Sharma and Yuvraaj Parashar come up with sensitive and daring performances. The film marks the return of Zeenat Aman [excellent] on the silver screen, besides an ensemble cast of Helen [good], Rituparna Sengupta [first-rate], Kabir Bedi [perfect], Maradona Rebello [confident], Aryan Vaid [okay], Tara Sharma [alright], Asha Sachdev [fair], Hazel [hardly there], Mahabanoo Kotwal [good], Viveck Vaswani [adequate] and Parikshat Sahni [wasted].

On the whole, DUNNO Y... NA JAANE KYUN is an honest attempt. Sure, it's not a perfect film, but at least it makes a sincere attempt to highlight the issue.

Ramaa - The Saviour Movie Reviews

Posted by Vinay Sharma on , under | comments (0)



By Taran Adarsh, November 12, 2010 - 13:01 IST


We often grumble that we don't make films targeted at kids, unlike the West where this genre has cut across barriers and reached out to not only kids, but also teens and adults. RAMAA - THE SAVIOUR tries to go into a zone where no Hindi film has visited in the past: Video gaming.

But a terrific idea is no guarantee for a terrific film. Everything depends on how gripping and absorbing the screenplay is and how deftly the director executes the subject material. RAMAA - THE SAVIOUR has some attention-grabbing moments, but they are few and far between.

Write your own movie review of Ramaa - The Saviour
It's a story of six kids - Rohan, Riddhi, Kunal, Komal, Sameer and Saanjh. The kids play a newly launched video game - The Last Battle - and while playing the game, they suddenly find themselves on an isolated island. The children, while exploring the island, run into trouble. Riddhi is attacked by a giant, Vali [Khali], but is rescued by Ramaa [Sahil Khan], who lives in this jungle all alone. Danger arrives in the form of a boat commanded by Kali with a small army of mercenaries and a scientist-assistant Samara [Tanushree Dutta]. The rest of the tale depicts the fight between the good and the evil.

It's a tough call to cast the right faces when you set out to attempt a kiddie film. They need to look the parts, but most importantly, live the parts as well. The kids in RAMAA - THE SAVIOUR pass the test with good marks.

But it's the writing that plays a spoilsport and doesn't do justice to the concept and the efforts invested in the project. Let me explain. To start with, there should have been some detailing on the protagonist [Sahil Khan], who comes across as a mix of Tarzan and Conan The Barbarian. He has the ability to connect via telepathy with humans and animals, we're told, but what is he doing in the secluded island-jungle? Besides, what's Vali's [Khali] connection with Ramaa? Also, why were they fighting in the first place? Is Vali human or demon or spirit? Tanushree's character isn't well penned either. She belongs to the evil camp, but crosses over to Ramaa's side without any valid justification.

Director Haadi Abrar deserves marks for opting for an innovative plot, but the writing lets him down. The action scenes [action: Peter Hein] are the mainstay of the enterprise. The fight on the river in particular is fantastic. Sejal Shah's cinematography captures the forests with expertise. Amongst the songs [Siddharth-Suhas], the one filmed on the kids, 'We Don't Need', is truly energetic.

Sahil Khan exhibits his physique to the optimum, but the screenplay doesn't offer him scope to exhibit histrionics. Tanushree surprises in action scenes. She's wonderful. The new villain, Taleb, looks ferocious. Khali is okay. The kids, all of them, are super confident.

On the whole, RAMAA - THE SAVIOUR isn't convincing. 

Disclaimer

Withvinay.com Acknowledges That Below Post Are Auto Gernated, WE CANNOT VERIFY THE ABSOLUTE FACTS OF EVERYTHING POSTED. POSTINGS MAY CONTAIN FACT, SPECULATION OR RUMOR. WE FIND IMAGES FROM THE WEB THAT ARE BELIEVED TO BELONG IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN. IF ANY STORIES OR IMAGES THAT APPEAR ON THE SITE ARE IN VIOLATION OF COPYRIGHT LAW, PLEASE email AND WE WILL REMOVE THE OFFENDING INFORMATION AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.